So I'm trying to decide between the DTV and the Retirement visa since I just turned 50. I have enough in savings to meet both the requirements for those two visas. The main drawback for the DTV is that I am a freelance video editor but have hardly any income from it right now. I do have about $1000 per month in rental income from my family but it's not in my name (another problem).
The retirement visa seems much more complicated than the DTV and since I'm still a freelancer that is my preferred visa. But seeing as my freelance income is almost nothing right now the savings won't be enough on it's own right now right?
The other option is soft power for the DTV which I'm also researching. Any advice is much appreciated, thanks!
EDIT: Thanks for the replies/advice. From all the responses it definitely looks like the best route is to apply for the Non-O from where I'm at now (US-San Francisco).
TLDR : Answer Summary
The individual is considering whether to apply for a DTV (Digital Nomad Visa) or a Retirement visa now that they are over 50. They have sufficient savings but limited income from freelance work and face complications concerning rental income not in their name. There's a debate in the comments about the complexity and advantages of each visa type, with many suggesting the Retirement visa as a long-term solution due to its stability and less frequent travel requirements. However, the DTV is also seen as suitable for those planning to work remotely from Thailand.
DTV VISA RESOURCES / SERVICES