@Victoria *****
there is no "reset" . . . . .There are no new "visa rules" or a new law.
What has changed, mandated from above, is the strict scrutinizing of your number of visa-exempt entries and the thorough check on "visa runners" (actually they meant to say "back-to-back border runners").The new approach taken by border officials is intended to ensure that the option to do a "visa run" is not abused.
Now as far as regarding extensions on visa-exempt entries, it does appear that the Immigration offices are indeed only issuing 7-day extensions if you already got one previous 30-day extension on any visa exempt entry
It is totally up to the discretion of the immigration officer you are in front of when you apply for the extension and they will tell you if you can get the 30-days extension, or if you're only going to get the 7-days extension.
The thing is right now it's totally subjective and up to the officer you are standing in front of when you go to stamp into the country for them to decide if you're a "real tourist" or if they think you're abusing the visa exempt entry program.
There's just no real concrete clear directive as far as what's what.
Some people with a 30-days extension already on a previous visa exempt entry reported getting another 30-days extension without any issue, however some have reported they only got a 7-days extension issued. So your experience might vary.
60 + 30 + 60 + 7 = a maximum of 157 days per year... and it seems this is regardless of whether you arrived by air or across a land border (some say that for a land border visa-exempt entry, you cannot get any extension at all)
Visa-exempt entries themselves are not limited, even though some believe that unlimited visa-free entries are possible by air. This is simply not true.
Visa-exempt entries are not limited to two entries to two entries per ārolling 1-yearā period
This is a misconception, and some agents and lawers spread this information to make profit from panicked people.
Agents are warning that you should not believe FAKE NEWS telling you that visa-exempt entries are limited to two per calendar year.
The old rule that visa-exempt entries were limited to two across land borders, got discontinued on July 15th, 2024. On the paper, visa-exempt entries by air or across land and sea were āunlimitedā after this date.
However this word āunlimitedā did not describe the real stance of Immigration ā THEY decide when your āpersonal limitā is up, not any text printed on the websites of Thai embassies.
Under certain circumstances, but always at the individual discretion of the border official, multiple visa-exempt entries are possible, like four, five or even more times, if you donāt abuse the system.
In this case, however, the entry history in your passport and on the immigration central computer must prove that your stays were short-term holidays (like only 2-4 weeks) and the total annual stay is not exceeding 157 days (some will say not exceed 180 days, some will say 150 days ā itās unclear)
And there should be several weeks (or months) abroad between each visa-exempt stay.
Your best proof of not abusing the system is when you can show that you returned to your home country between each visa-exempt stay, or stayed abroad for a long time. And that you show an onward travel proof
(ATTENTION: an āonwardticketā can be scolded upon by Immigration and you can be accused of showing a faked ticket, denied entry and being forced to buy a ticket back to your origin)
The intended aim of the new approach was to prohibit "visa runs," where you only entered briefly a neighboring country and then immediately re-entered.
You must be able to prove the planned short stay at the immigration counterāfor example, with proof of onward travel or a return journey, such as a flight ticket.
It seems that a border official would consider you being a "genuine" tourist based on such short holiday trips within a year.
In this case, they expect to see on their central computer that you never extended the 60-days visa-exempt stay permit ā i.e. maximized ā any of these short trips.
The 7-day extension is a REAL extension. It's not the same as the stamp "application for extension denied, you have 7 days to leave the Kingdom", even if to some people it looks like a āgrace periodā. I have already seen the stamp of a 7-days extension, it takes up half of a passport page. The original āyou have 7 days to leaveā stamp is smaller, takes something like a quarter up to one-third of the page
What has become crystal clear, is that "per year" can be defined as "per one-year period.
Some people still say they meant ācalendar yearā but to me this doesnāt make any sense, and we have received several confirmations that nothing āresets in a new calendar yearā. The count will be for a full one-year period, period.
Those who want to be on the safe side should obtain a single-entry tourist visa in advance for stays of up to 60 days, with the option to extend for 30 more days.
Someone entering on a 6-months multi-entry tourist visa (two extensions possible) and a half-year interval outside of Thailand between each METV, is good to go for a maximum of consecutive ātouristicā 180 days stay per 1-year period
(theoretically you could get 8 months of stay out of the METV but letās not make it too complicated, as we have received some recent reports that the ālastā 2 months admitted stay out of a METV were refused at the border)