What are the requirements for UK citizens entering Thailand without a visa?

Dec 24, 2023
a year ago
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
At the risk of incurring the wrath of keyboard warriors who practise the ethos “ if it has never happened to me it can never happen to anyone” here’s a “myth buster” of sorts. I’m always concerned when I enter Thailand as I come a lot, always without a visa. I usually extend my exempt entry when here to get up to 60 days. A very knowledgeable person once advised that there are really three requirements to entry for a UK citizen ( may apply to other nationalities) , 20,000 baht in cash in your pocket, an outward bound ticket within your initial 30 day stay and proof of accommodation. Now when people post on here that you need these things there is normally a massive bun fight from the believers ( those who agree you need these things) and the non believers ( stupid people who believe that if they have never been asked no-one has).

So far in the last 13 months I have entered Thailand by air 6 times. Three times I’ve been asked at the airport by immigration to show onward travel, once I’ve been asked to show proof of accommodation but never have I been asked to show 20,000 baht. Does that mean I’ve stopped carrying 20,000 baht in my pocket when I enter? No, I always have it with me. Ok let the bun fight commence “ haters always going to hate” but like my momma used to say “ stupid is stupid posts” 😂😂😂😂😂

PS. I’m not a criminal, not flagged by interpol and think as a 57 year old semi retired solicitor and former police officer I appear pretty respectable, I do have an 8 day overstay stamp from a couple of years ago when I tested positive for covid towards the end of my 30 days and therefore felt morally, if not legally, bound to quarantine until negative and so overstayed between initial 30 days and 30 day extension. Perhaps that’s why I get asked but it just shows that if they are looking at you closely it might be wise to always have these three things.

Edit to save my sanity!!!!

For the purpose of clarity and to appease Maxim Thibodeau , everything in my post is factually incorrect. Everything he says is correct as he is without doubt the cleverest person I have never met. His point of view rightly supersedes everyone else. I sincerely apologise for my posts lack of nuance!

P.S. can anyone who knows him explain why he is so so very angry?
4,369
views
29
likes
141
all likes
70
replies
0
images
22
users
TLDR : Answer Summary
The post discusses the entry requirements for UK citizens (and possibly other nationalities) entering Thailand without a visa. It emphasizes that while not always asked, it is advisable to carry certain documents: 20,000 baht in cash, proof of onward travel, and proof of accommodation. The author shares personal experiences from multiple entries into Thailand where these requirements were inconsistently enforced, sparking a debate on the necessity of having these documents ready. The discussion also includes differing viewpoints on the likelihood of being asked for these items at immigration checkpoints.
Loic ***************
You writing a book Jack?
Bob **********
Your about to be denied entry if there asking as that will be the reason to deny entry just buy a proper visa and that will give you a better chance
Terary **********
Was that a question?
Robin ********
Interesting post until the morally bound to lock myself away with a cold 🥶 statement 🤣🤣🤣
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Robin *******
hi robin that was irony …..I could only travel because I had vaxxed. I stayed in doors with covid as I felt like shit and didn’t particularly want to queue for two hours feeling like shit.
Burnard ************
@Charlie *******
Your justification is a good one. However, your reasons do not matter to Immigration.

Overstay is overstay. That is the cold truth. Your reason isn't entered into to Immigration Database.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Burnard ***********
overstay was a while back and I’ve entered Thailand 8 or 9 times since then
Steve **********
Must be asked Q !

If flew in 6 times in 13 mo's, no question Immigration knows you have the where-with-all to access 20k baht, but why aren't you living here ?

8 day overstay with your visas, doubt in anyone cares.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Steve *********
it’s also 11 times in 2 years 6 months so I must be doing something right
Steve **********
@Charlie *******
Then don't worry about Immig, you're seasoned in their eyes.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Steve *********
I need to go to UK periodically to make money to spend here. I’m old enough for the waiting to die ( retirement ) visa but don’t want to tie up £
*****
for a visa when I have to go back to Uk 3 or 4 months of the year. Been told , by very clever person, my type of travel , always leaving for at least 3 weeks - 6 weeks and going back to UK will never raise a flag with immigration.
Warren ******
or you get the visa from an agent without the real funds -- that is a huge savings and only slightly illegal -- being a solicitor used to guarantee to all your undeniable smarts -- but the lawyers we have seen since Jan 6, 2021 have voided that automatic acceptance. I think the most common complaint from the masses is the daily post of "How do I get a visa to Thailand?" -- the moderator has much more patience than me -- my reply would be "Scroll down at least one inch to see that simple google search question asked and answered - almost every day. I'm just reading daily for entertainment and you sir! - have made my day. No offense intended :)
Steve **********
@Charlie *******
Why would you tie up money, are you talking about the 800 000 baht.

Most of us don't, we show income of , or over 65,000/ mo from foreign source .

Been 20 years. Always on income, would never tie up funds .
Burnard ************
Should always have those things. They don't usually ask, until one day they do and you are screwed.

Immigration allowing you to come in 6 times, in 13 months, and extending every time is a bit unusual. Kinda pushing your luck to the limit, I think.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Burnard ***********
spot on about the 3 things but I always leave 3-6 weeks between visits and my next destination is usually Uk before I return , never been challenged on that and been advised by that clever person from my post,
@Brandon ***********
, that I probably would not be as I’m not exactly doing border runs. If I’m ever asked I will simply say I go to England to make money I come to Thailand to spend it! I think that will always get me in.
Burnard ************
@Charlie *******
Going back to your home country before coming back is a good idea. I did the 3-6 week thing also, just as you described. Until the last time I entered Thailand and got in trouble for it.

They don't like you to be in Thailand more than 180 days in a 12 month period.

No, I am not blacklisted or anything but it was an extremely bad experience and I almost got refused entry. There is more to the story but that is the gist.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Burnard ***********
I’ve heard a few people mention this 180 day thing and I’ve seen it criticised and debunked, I never had that issue yet, hopefully I won’t.
@Maxim **********
see I don’t agree with this guy but accepted his experience and point of view at face value ….that’s actually called tolerance , learn that and because you are so very clever you might become perfect!!!
Burnard ************
@Charlie *******
It is what it is. I said it is a good idea that you are going back to your home country before continuing your long-term stays in Thailand but keep doing this and you will eventually see that I am telling you the God's Honest Truth!

You cannot think with a Western mindset in Thailand. Not all rules have to be written. You, being a Lawyer (according to a previous post) will further confuse you in Thailand. What is or isn't written is not sacrosanct.
Burnard ************
@Charlie *******
Nobody debunked it. It is just something they have discretion to use against you. As, I think, you posted in your original post, it isn't a problem until it is.

Remember, Immigration has "Discretion" and ot does not always work in your favor. Ignore this at your own risk.

In their mind a "Tourist" does not need to stay more than 180 days a year.

It isn't written but in Thailand it does not need to be.
Maxim ***********
@Charlie *******
The 180 days thing is indeed not a law, but you incorrectly pointed out that it was "debunked", which is not true. What is debunked is that it's a law (it's not), but at BKK airport, officers will sometime give the 180 days reason to try to deny you, but then will write something else in Thai as tho why they denied you entry. It's a ploy on their part and foreigners who can't read Thai get suck up into it. Again, being precise matter because anyone in that airport could get caught thinking that the officer was right in telling them that crap.
Burnard ************
Jared **********
Some of the issue is just how wildly inconsistent the embassies, airlines, and immigration is from enforcing whichever rules they decide to for that day and the leeway in the discretion of the IO directly.
Kool *******
Understand that Thai immigration stereotypes, and profiles. They have a lower tolerance for someone backpacking than they do for those traveling with suitcases. Thailand does not want poor, little money, travelers. They also do not want tourists trying to stay here long term on tourist visas, when they never return to their home country. If you don't fit their profiling you'll be fine.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Kool ******
I sort of agree but I often entry in jeans or combats with a biker jacket and a pack on my back, they don’t get to see if I have a suitcase until I clear immigration but generally you are correct I think they want to restrict the border bounce back packers and encourage affluent tourists and retirees
Maxim ***********
Your post lack nuance and your interpretation of a believer vs non-believer is also too general. Each airport and border will have a different level of scrunity from always asking all 3 proof of to never ask, to everything in the middle. For example, in BKK airport, they ask a lot, but in Nong Khai or Mukdahan border, they never ask. The word "never" doesn't imply "rarely", it truly mean never as in "no reported case of anyone being ask any of the 3 proof of".
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Maxim **********
I think you are confused…….did you miss taking your medication today?
Maxim ***********
@Charlie *******
Which part is confusing to you? Your whole post is useless and factually incorrect because you make generalization where nuance apply.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Maxim **********
I said you are confused , take your pills and everything will look better to you. Think calm thoughts. Is nuance your favourite word? I think you are one of the stupid people I mentioned in my post. My post is not about what you will be asked or I will be asked it’s about what you or I could be asked. It does not matter where you cross the border the IO has the discretion to refuse entry and can use lack of funds , lack of onward travel or lack of address in Thailand as a lawful reason to do so, because they don’t use that discretion every where does not make my post factually incorrect. My post points to know it alls like your self. You’ve never been asked great! Good for you. You do realise you are like the woman who looks at a marching band and insists everyone is out of step with her son……..

You obviously understand the immigration laws better than I do, that’s why you don’t fly into BKK and spend an extra day travelling via Malaysia. If you must be right and have the last word then I admit it you are right and 99% of everyone else , including me , are totally wrong and we all bow down to your obvious superior intellect. I’m sorry but if I’d known nuance was your buzz word I would tried for a more nuanced post…….

Now can you post your next comment somewhere else ?
Maxim ***********
@Charlie *******
Since we are on the "mythbuster" train, let me correct you on two common myths:

1) "It does not matter where you cross the border, it is at IO discretion". This is a common myth which come from a "partially true" fact. The fact is that at certain airports and borders it's a gamble whether you will get asked or not (this is where the common "IO discretion" misconception come from). BUT, at some airports and borders, you will never get asked. This is why you cannot generalize the "IO discretion" statement. People who do generalize are well intended but are misinformed.

2) "If you must be right and have the last word then I admit it you are right and 99% of everyone else, including me, are totally wrong". The fact is that this group is called "Thailand Visa Advice..." and is filled with people with very little knowledge and experience (that's why they are here asking questions and learning). The people who already knows enough about Visas and "everything else" are either sometimes helping others here (I do that sometimes) or are not part of this group because they don't need help nor want to help others on FB. So no, 99% don't agree with you. Most of the people who joined this group to help others would disagree with most of what you said.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Maxim **********
look mate it’s Christmas Day and you are obviously too clever for me !! After all you can speak for 99% of the people in this group. Again I ask why are you so angry? If we were in a room together I suspect you would be shouting at me. All my post says is that there are three things you can be asked. I have been asked two of them so always ensure I could answer all three if asked. Some people in this group say that’s rubbish and no-one is ever asked and they base that on their experience of never being asked. The only fault I can find with my post is that I didn’t state my points of entry. I’ve entered via Phuket 11 times and Bangkok once in just over 2 years. My experience does not stretch back as far as yours but I’m talking about what is happening now in Phuket airport.

You appear to have a need to be the cleverest person in the room, take the title you are very very clever, you even use the word nuance ( glad you’ve stopped that now by the way)

May I leave you with a couple of thoughts :

1. You being right doesn’t mean I can’t be right also .

2. My post is directed at frequent travellers to Phuket and Bangkok who enter visa exempt, not other more obscure ports or land crossings of which I have no experience

3. Presenting as so angry is not a good look

4. If any one person who enters Thailand at any one of its many entry points has ever been asked the three questions then my post is factually correct

5. You need to perfect your understanding of English as I feel a lot of your anger and argument is driven by your basic lack of understanding of what my original post actually said.

6. Going back to thought one if it means so much to you , you can be right and I’m happy to say I’m wrong….but we all know the truth.

7. My post is intended to help and if it helps just one person then I’m happy , I’m just so sorry that my true and factual experiences offend you so much.

8. You are the cleverest person I have never met!!

One of the above thoughts is a lie…….

Now Fuck off and enjoy Christmas you sad sad man
Maxim ***********
@Charlie *******
I am quite calm, does not use any curse word nor express angriness, projection much? You are quite agitated and argumentative while knowing very little.

1) Being right is objective, having an opinion is subjective.

2) Nowhere in your OP did you specify that it was about BKK, Phuket, or both.

3) I am not here to please you, but to provide factual information, which often get lost in the sea of bad info.

4) Yes, your post would be factually correct, but as of today, not correct since some borders and airports have not ask for any of the 3 proof of to anyone ever.

5) Your original post was a generalization and a bad attempt at debunking a myth which you failed to do.

6) It's not about whose right or wrong, it's about which info is correct.

7) Your post is not intended to help, since nobody asked, it was unwanted. You made a post trying to debunk a myth, but failed to do so.

8.) Tod Daniels is the cleverest in this group.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Maxim **********
you are really silly so just answer this ,

Is it correct that you need 20,000 Thai baht in your possession to enter Thailand, do you need an onward travel ticket within your 30 day exemption stamp and do you need to have proof of accommodation? Is that or is that not the law? Also has anyone ever been asked to provide these things at any port of entry. I think it’s yes x 4 .

You are a stupid stupid person. Also where is it written that you can only help if asked? You can help by volunteering facts which I have done. I never once said you will be asked to provide the above three things at any port, I said you could be asked and that is factually correct and objectively true.

You are tiresome, stupid and angry , now please fuck off and try to enjoy Christmas.
Nigel *********
@Maxim **********
I thought Tod Daniels was sacked? 🎅
James **********
Good on you. Enjoy your day.
Chris ********
Well said that man! I stay for a max of 60 with a 30 day ext on my uk exempt v then I go to Laos for a week (friends there so a week is easy) and on my return with no tix booked for onward, even with a few overstay days stamped in my passport, I’m asked how long I need, I advise I’m going to laos, Cambodia or Vietnam in 25 days and so need a 30 day stamp, no onward or cash/account balance req and immediately I’m given the full 30 and the fully legal 60 day cycle starts again! Just my personal experience but it’s tried and tested and maybe it helps others! Gives me 2 in and out and 2in again without issue!

Merry Christmas ya filthy animals! 🫶🏻🤙🏼🎅🏼
Tim *********
Great post Charlie 👏👏👏
Chris *********
If your staying in someone’s private home what proof of accommodation do I need?
David ********
@Chris ********
I have been asked once for ‘proof’ of accommodations …I gave the address of where I would be staying (the address of my then girlfriend, now wife, from a ‘ratty hand written’ note I pulled from my wallet in front of the officer.)

My experience is that unless they have a reason to suspect you of some ‘subterfuge’ they are just interested in crossing one or two ‘t’s (they didn’t ask about 20K baht cash so they didn’t seem to worry about dotting any ‘i’s!?)

It’s always best to prepare to show the three proofs, although I admit to often forgetting about the ‘cash’ rule, which I don’t recall ever being asked to show … return flight, and address are the only things I recall explicitly being asked to show, and even then the ‘proof’ required could be ‘created’ by an 8 year old with an inkjet and MS-paint. ;-0
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@David *******
when I was asked for proof of address a screen shot of a part typed part handwritten tenancy agreement satisfied. Never been asked for the cash but always carry it. Also just on a practical note I get a decent exchange rate which is better than my bank and I avoid ATM commission by bringing cash. Different people do different things tho.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Chris ********
but if it’s a first visit or long time since previous visit I doubt you would asked. Remember this post if not about what you are asked it’s about what you could be asked if the immigration officer wants to deny you entry,
Chris ********
@Charlie *******
I agree! of course each case if diff but if you feel you’re close to the edge then prior prep re courses for an ed v and a few well rehearsed sentences will not go amiss in this sitch! For me it’s a matter of, was it touch and go last time? If so, do the graft needed in prep for next! A 3 month ev is pretty easy to acquire these days and if so, anyone wanting to stay, this option should be financially viable for anyone considering a longer stay… at the minimum!
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Chris *******
yes of course, all correct, but remember this post is aimed at the frequent visitor travelling without a visa entering under visa exemption 30 day stamp.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Chris ********
very good question I can only suggest the address and a letter of invitation. I’ve always had a rental agreement as I rent a house. Any suggestions anyone?
Nigel **************
@Charlie *******
letter of invitation from thd address owner
Tore *********
100% Pretty stupid to get stuck and return with your tail between your legs becoy “It never happens”. Except it does.

Most tourists don’t know these rules though. But I’m absolutely convinced they use it as a reason to reject if there is something they don’t like. Which, well they can because the rules say so. Simple as that
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Tore *****************
that’s 100% accurate and that’s why you should always comply with these three simple ( stupid) conditions
Andreas *********
myself as a 12-years volunteer visa- related- and Thailand advisor love your comment a lot. You hit the nail on its head
Guy ******
Humbug
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Guy *****
are you disagreeing? That would make you stupid or dead as you appear to be breathing you must be alive! My deepest sympathies to your family to have to endure this heartbreak……
Tore *********
@Guy *****
yes, you seem to be….
Andreas *********
@Guy *****
just scroll on . .no one needs your "sexpertise"
Steve ***************
I have entered Thailand by air four times this year, three of those times I was asked to show my departure flight within the 30 day visa exempt period at BKK. It makes sense to have this, along with proof of funds and accommodation to hand when going through passport control.
Alistair **********
What non believers?? They're the literal requirements of immigration
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Alistair *********
yes but if you follow posts in this group there will always be non believers who say “ Rubbish! I’ve been coming for 20+ years and it’s only airlines that ask for onward travel …. There’s a lot of stupid people about but being stupid is like being dead , you don’t know you are stupid or dead, it’s the people around you who suffer and get upset……..
Alistair **********
@Charlie *******
1-2 people maybe? Almost all just say immigration rarely ask unless you have a questionable history. I think you've fighting imaginary non-believers
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Alistair *********
you would be surprised I think
Alistair **********
@Charlie *******
Brandon replies to almost every post of someone with questionable history to have the 3 proofs, I and others have many times too. Not once has someone said it's not a requirement. You'd think they'd be replying here
Maxim ***********
@Alistair *********
I do not think that Brandon give such advice in every instance, but since most people ask about BKK or Phuket, it sure seems like it.
Alistair **********
@Maxim **********
not every instance there's way too much variability, but he does say it very often, as do others. Yet I don't see people say they aren't a requirement. Maybe x border don't normally ask, or a less nuanced response, but no one says that it's not a requirement that can't be asked for
Maxim ***********
@Charlie *******
The distinction/nuance between each airport and each border was not part of your initial post. I could make a spreadsheet of which airport always vs sometimes vs never ask, and same with the borders, but the people who never carry the "proof of" mostly have my level of knowledge so they would not benefit anyways. I have not carry any proof of since 2015, been here since 2012. Never been questioned nor ask any of the 3 proof of, and got married to my Thai wife 2 years ago.

One of the reason why such confusion happens (lack of nuance) is because most people who preach having all 3 "proof of" are using BKK as a barometer (this is why some people use the term "requirement"). BKK airport is the strictest in Thailand (by far). So a lot of people here got questioned in BKK airport, denied, or asked all 3 proof of. So now they are using BKK as the norm or the reason why "better be safe than sorry".

Most people who enter by air will do from BKK so there is a selection bias. But if you enter from let say Hat Yai, it's a piece of cake. You may ask how the fuck can you do UK to Hat Yai, you can't, but what you can do is UK to Malaysia, than to Hat Yai. I did this a few times just to avoid BKK airport (not from UK but you get my point). And it was overall cheaper $$ because Malaysian airlines are cheap.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Maxim **********
I enter via Phuket not Bangkok, but your post actually proved my point! you take steps to avoid Bangkok as you know people may be asked. Also if you are married to a Thai you have a visa and a set amount of money in the bank so you don’t need the three requirements. 😂😂😂😂😂
Maxim ***********
@Charlie *******
I do not have a set amount of money in the bank, nor am I on Non O most of the time, nor do I need money in the bank to get said Non O, nor am I exempt of the 3 requirements (proof of) if I am on Non O. The sheer confidence in which you said all that while being wrong is astonishing.

Also, I do not take steps to avoid BKK because I could be asked... I avoid BKK because I would get denied entry and would need to pay 8k baht for an agent VIP line, but there no way you know what I'm talking about.

You are relatively new to Thailand, probably do a lot of in and out, but are unfamiliar with how each immigration, airport and border entry works. It's not a one shoe fit all. Each immigration, airport and border enforce the laws differently. Pĥuket use to be relatively easy, but it's been stricter the last few years.

But some airports and borders will simply never ask (no reports of anyone being asked). For example, Mukdahan and Nong Khai border will never ever ask you for any of the 3 proof of. And you won't find report online (on FB, Forum, etc) of anyone being ask.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Maxim **********
we all have different experiences. Are you saying that the three proofs as you call them are not needed anywhere? Because I’m not actually saying that they are needed anywhere. I’m saying when you enter Thailand you can be refused entry for those three reasons so it’s my practise to be able to provide the “three proofs” that works for me , may not work for you. I still just don’t understand why you are so angry. You say some airports will never ask and there are no reports of them ever asking. So are you saying it’s only ever happened if it’s reported on Facebook forums? There is actually a world outside of Facebook. I am thankful, however, that you got through this post without using the word nuance.

Just for the avoidance of doubt , you are right in everything you say I, and everyone else who liked and commented positively , are totally wrong and appreciate how clever you are…..no need to respond just please , please take you meds and calm down 😂😂👍👍👍👍
Maxim ***********
@Charlie *******
"Are you saying that the three proofs as you call them are not needed anywhere?". No, I am saying that some airports and borders will ask most of the time, some will sometimes ask, and some will never ask. The reason why being precise matter is that it confuse people if you generalize too much and can make them scared for no reason.

For example, last week on this FB group someone was scared out of his mind because he was about to enter Thailand via Nong Khai and didn't have 20k baht since he had too much Laos Kip and didn't exchange it, blabla, etc. Little did he know, Nong Khai does not ask to see 20k baht or any of the other 2 proof of. I live near Nong Khai border, I cross that border frequently, they just don't care about these requirements. I've seen thousands of people cross there over the years, never once did I encounter any foreigner being asked for anything. It's a chill border.

Poipet would be the complete opposite, going there without all 3 proof of is suicidal. So if someone say that the 3 proof of is necessary and at IO discretion without specifying which airport and border, he is spreading misinformation. The same if someone says "Ive never been asked anywhere!!", that would in fact be even more damaging because then someone could try to border run Poipet and be in trouble since it's a hard border to bounce from.

The example above about the scared dude entering from Nong Khai is why precising the airport and the border matter.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Maxim **********
you seem to be confusing “ it’s never happened” with “it can never happen” if it’s law and I believe it is each and every port of entry can at any time change its policy. You appear to be now dragging in all sorts of nonsense about different ports and border runs etc to make your point. As I see it your point is all ports can ask but some don’t and never will. My point is all ports can ask and some do so I travel prepared to be asked. These are not opposing views that are mutually exclusive.

But as I’ve now said repeatedly ( almost as boring as your use of nuance) you appear to be very angry and have a need to be right. However being right is not quite good enough as I have to be wrong to satisfy your ego.

I pity your poor poor wife and all your long suffering friends.
Maxim ***********
@Charlie *******
You are bringing hypothetical. Yes, of course, you can be very unlucky and the exact day that a policy change at a particular airport or border you are the unlucky first to be ask what was previously never ask. Just like an airplane could crash into my house and kill me in my sleep. It's possible, but that doesn't mean that I need to shield my bedroom from that "hypothetical". Went the risk is that low, you go with the flow unless proven otherwise.

The best example is the Non O Multi Entry based on Marriage which was possible for over 10 years at Savannakhet without showing 400k baht in bank account. A few months ago they suddenly stopped allowing the Multi Entry without the 400k baht. The unlucky who were there that day got denied and had to do a Single Entry. They were extremely unlucky to be there that exact day. Of course there is a risk that a policy change, but as of now some border and airports ask 0% of the time for any of the 3 proof of. It's the only factual info we have, not what may or may not happen in the future.
Charlie ********
ORIGINAL POSTER
@Maxim **********
wow are you starting to calm down and actually agree we are singing the same song? ….. keep taking the meds they are making you a better person
Ron ******
@Charlie *******
the interpretation and application of immigration laws in Thailand relies entirely with the officer who greets you on arrival. Nobody in this group has a crystal ball and can predict what that officer will want to see or not. As they say, it’ll be alright until it’s not!
Henry *********
Good advice 👍
Andi ***********
Well said. Always better to be safe than sorry.
Thai Visa Advice and Everything Else
... members · 60% approval rate
The Thai Visa Advice And Everything Else group allows for a broad range of discussions on life in Thailand, beyond just visa inquiries.
Join the Group
Thai Visa Advice and Everything Else
View the Conversation
Thai Visa Advice and Everything Else