When regularly visiting Thailand as a tourist I always thought that you're more likely to be turned down at an immigration office when applying for the 2 month visa than you are turning up for at the airport for an exempt stamp. Is my thinking correct or wrong?
My situation:
I've entered Thailand 3 times already these past 6 months. Each time I leave Thailand I stay somewhere for around 2 weeks before returning so no quick boarder bounces or any overstays. I'm never asked any questions by immigration but I'm aware they soon probably will. Next time, in March, would I be safer applying for a two month visa somewhere or entering on another stamp if again leaving it a couple of weeks before returning?
My Elite Visa application got rejected last year after being on a volunteer visa for a couple of years prior so I've been forced to do these tourist in and outs until I can find another legitimate way to stay here. Just curious of other's experiences and advice 👍 Thanks.
TLDR : Answer Summary
The conversation revolves around the safety and likelihood of successful entry into Thailand when applying for tourist visas versus using visa-exempt stamps. The original poster has made multiple short visits to Thailand and is considering their options after a past rejection for an Elite Visa. Community members suggest that obtaining a tourist visa may provide a higher success rate at immigration compared to relying on visa exemptions, especially after several entries within a short time. They share personal experiences and insights regarding immigration practices, emphasizing that outcomes can vary based on individual circumstances and the officer on duty.