The conversation revolves around the DTV visa and its mention of Muay Thai activities. The original poster expressed happiness at receiving their DTV visa, which includes a mention of Muay Thai, contrary to previous reports. Comments clarify that earlier applicants may not have had specific activities listed due to varying embassy policies regarding the free text line on the visa.
What you are referring to on the DTV visa is a free text line. This free text line is Embassy policy or even IO specific. Some embassies leave it blank, some write “Employment Prohibited “, some write the soft power activity you applied for, some write “Workation”, it’s a free text line, anything could be written there.
Benjamin *********
I got it 2 weeks ago and no mention of Boxing on mine
Anonymous ******************
It has been quite some time people are getting it mentioned though. Only the early applicants didn't get it.
Dany ********
only in the early stages of the DTV it did NOT list your dtv category
So I should prove to you that requirements for DTV visa do not stop before the end of the validity? For any visa no matter which country the purpose of stay should fit with the visa.
You and the other jokers keep telling that this is not the case for DTV and that at some moment the requirements are no longer in place, but not one of the jokers can tell what is this moment.
This has nothing to do with jealousy, I also have DTV visa, and to me for now it does not make any difference that a lot of people misuse the DTV just like ED was misused before.
If it makes you happy to abuse the visa, be my guest, it is not at my cost.
also if you have a DTV are you just constantly doing a soft power activity non stop for 5 years because you fear that they will start asking for proof hahaha
You think what you want, to me it looks like you are a troll yourself.
I do not make up any immigration rules, but you seem to know nothing at all about immigration rules, I wonder if there is anything at all you know something about.
When you say I am clearly wrong when I tell requirements for the visa are in place during the validity period, just tell me from which moment on the requirements are not in place anymore, and where I can read that.
It just might be nice to know, and in my favour at the moment I might not comply with the rules anymore.
trying to help you delusional people out just letting you know what’s coming if they make Expats prove they have the money to live here why would you think there going to let people come with no classes or proof of income
haha so you're guessing that they will cut the right to work and require ongoing course participation? Sounds like you're pissed and got the wrong Visa. You can work for a foreign company in Thailand even if you applied with soft power. There is absolutely no proof or indication any of that will happen. I've almost had my DTV for a year and I haven't been asked in over 10 entries that I've even completed the original course.
ongoing course participation now is a visa requirement, it is just not enforced when you get in the country, if they want they can check anyone entering the country without changing one rule.
the course is the reason for granting your visit in Thailand, no course means no reason to visit Thailand, just like not working means you cannot enter on a work visa, not folliwing school you can not enter on ED visa, not married you cannot enter on a marriage visa. Visa requirements clearly state what is needed.
You are just one of the jokers telling that requirements for DTV stop before the 5 year validity period, but cannot tell at what moment they stop, nor where this info is coming from.
Do they stop right after you applied? Or do they stop after your first entry? Or after the first year? Just tell me and also tell why they stop.
Otherwise the only conclusion can be that they don't stop before the visa is ended.
So again no answer on the question at what moment the requirements for DTV stop, just a silly completely unrelevant remark which has nothing to do with the subject?
I only can see this as a confirmation you know I am right that requirements are for the full 5 years.
I do not make any claim at all, you are the one that is telling requirements stop before the end date of the visa without any proof and not eve the details when it ends.
Do you think you are able to say anything that makes sense at all?
Why should it need additional proof that a requirement on day 1 still is valid on day 365 and on day 1826?
The purpose of the DTV is clearly described on the page where you apply, and nowhere is mentioned that this changes during validity.
Only some jokers here keep telling that this is not true, but when you ask them where it says that requirements stop at a certain moment, they cannot answer.
They cannot even tell at which day requirements stop.
you're arguing a point so show some evidence. I want to see the section that says you must prove ongoing participation for the duration of the 5 year visa. Until then I think you are wrong and just guessing.
When you think requirements ar not valid for the full 5 year of the visa, just show me where it makes that exception and also tell me at what moment requirements stop.
When you apply for a visa for a special purpose of stay, valid 5 years, every normal thinking person will understand that the requirements for that visa also are for 5 years, unless stated different.
I see nowhere mentioned officially that DTV is an exception on this rule.
And if you think I'm wrong, I don't care at all, I've long since realized that you're not the smartest person here.
there is literally thousands of people in Thailand on a DTV that just paid for a 1 month course. Show me one, just ONE example of somebody being kicked out and visa cancelled because they were asked for proof of ongoing activity. That's right you can't.
No need to tell me that DTV is heavily abused, and I don't have figures about what immigrations checks and how much people they stop, neither do you have, and I think they will not publish this figures.
the only requirement for DTV is a single course. No requirement for ongoing participation stipulated anywhere and not a single example of somebody being asked to prove ongoing participation has been seen by anyone. Why do you guys insist on speculation?