Hi everybody ! I am considering taking a retirement visa to Thailand. Either a non-O or a non-O-A. Here in this group, and in other groups concerning Thailand long term visa, people mostly mention taking a 3 months non-O visa, and then extend it in Thailand, and rarely mention the non O-A 1 year visa. Why is that ? why to take a 3 month visa, where one must rush to get all these documents and open a bank account immediately, when it's possible to get a 1 year visa and have more time to do everything calmly, without a rush ? Is it about the need for a health insurance in the non- OA ? or does the non OA have other dis-advantages ? Would appreciate a clarification.... Many thanks :-)